Skip to content
OnMSFT.com
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Windows
  • Surface
  • Xbox
  • How-To
  • OnPodcast
  • Edge
  • Teams
  • Gaming
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Windows
  • Surface
  • Xbox
  • How-To
  • OnPodcast
  • Edge
  • Teams
  • Gaming
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Stephen Elop apparently faced “very difficult questions” about lack of flagship Lumias

Stephen Elop apparently faced “very difficult questions” about lack of flagship Lumias

Sean Cameron Sean Cameron
August 26, 2019
3 min read

Elop

There can be no question that Stephen Elop, who recently announced his departure from Microsoft, has been one of the more controversial executives in Microsoft’s long history. Much of this controversy centered first around his handling of Nokia, and then the Lumia line. Appearing on Windows Weekly, Todd Bishop of Geekwire had a little more to say on the subject, specifically regarding Elop’s departure and the decisions he made while in charge.

It was at a recent ‘Town meeting’ that Elop apparently faced questions from Microsoft employees regarding this state of affairs, that he supposedly admitted were “very difficult” to answer. Specifically, they brought up the lack of premium Lumia hardware.

Since the acquisition of Nokia’s Device and Services division by Microsoft in 2014, Elop was placed in control of shaping the Lumia line-up. Throughout the following year however, as more and more budget devices were revealed, the state of the Lumia line as a whole began to fall into dispute, with many thinking that Microsoft had chosen to abandon high-end hardware altogether.

In a recent memo to employees, Satya Nadella, the CEO of Microsoft, expounded on the need to make “tough decisions“. It seems now that, according to the departing Elop, one of these self-said tough decisions has been to lower the laser focus on growth in the budget end of the market, and instead once more invest in the high-end, in successors to the Lumia 930 and 1520. Given the incredible success of devices like the Lumia 520, it is easy to see why abandoning a ‘winning strategy’ may have seemed so tough.

930

That the decision to focus on the lower end of the mobile phone market has proven to be controversial both internally and externally is hardly surprising. In a recent editorial, we explored precisely what the difference between a flagship and a budget device was, and the answer was rather simple: love. Where flagships inspire devotion, choice at the lower-end of the market is nearly always one of pragmatism.

With the rollout of Windows 10 due soon, it is expected that full development of Windows 10 Mobile will ramp up considerably. Launching a new platform, especially a mobile platform, is never an easy task — press is essential. And in the mobile sphere, nothing generates positive coverage quite like some nice curvy glass, that is to say, a well-designed, powerful handset.

What effect the departure of Stephen Elop from Microsoft will have on the future of Lumia is difficult to tell at this point in time. Despite inspiring a great deal of passion in many, it is Elop more than almost anyone else who has been personally responsible for the continuation and proliferation of the brand.

520

At a time when Nokia was imploding, he published the infamous ‘burning platform’ memo, moving the then largest mobile phone manufacturer in the world firmly into Windows Phone. Nokia then went on to become easily the largest Windows Phone manufacturer, and its Lumia line provided the iconic design that the platform needed to truly distinguish itself.

Without Elop, Windows Phone would not stand where it does, and yet his departure could herald a new coming for a platform that desperately needs one. Do you think that more should have been done to focus on premium hardware at an earlier point? Let us know what you think in the comments below.

Further reading: Lumia, Microsoft, Windows Phone

Share this article:
Tags:
Lumia Microsoft Windows Phone
Previous Article How does the Lumia Cyan firmware affect battery life? Next Article Microsoft updates its terms and policies, says it won’t look into your emails

Related Articles

Intel Panther Lake laptops see major price hikes due to component shortages, while Apple MacBook M5 models continue with unchanged pricing globally.

Intel Laptop Price Increase Hits Panther Lake Models, Apple MacBook M5 Stays Stable

April 5, 2026
State of Decay 3 Playtests Confirmed With Mutated Zombies and Co-op

State of Decay 3 Playtests Confirmed With Mutated Zombies and Co-op

April 5, 2026
Starfield launches on PS5 with 4K visual mode, 60FPS performance option, DualSense features, and new DLC available at release for players

Starfield Launches on PS5 With Two Modes and Full DualSense Support

April 5, 2026

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Intel Laptop Price Increase Hits Panther Lake Models, Apple MacBook M5 Stays Stable
  • State of Decay 3 Playtests Confirmed With Mutated Zombies and Co-op
  • Starfield Launches on PS5 With Two Modes and Full DualSense Support
  • ASUS Accused of Failing to Fix Laptop After 10 RMAs, User Denied 11th Request
  • New Rowhammer Attacks Turn NVIDIA GPUs Into a System-Level Security Risk

Recent Comments

  1. XxRIVTYxX on Intel Says It Tried to Help Before Crimson Desert Dropped Arc Support
  2. Gaurav Kumar on Chrome Prepares Nudge to ‘Move Tabs to the Side’ as Vertical Tabs Near Release
OnMSFT.com

The Tech News Site

Categories

  • Windows
  • Surface
  • Xbox
  • How-To
  • OnPodcast
  • Gaming
  • Edge
  • Teams

Recent Posts

  • Intel Laptop Price Increase Hits Panther Lake Models, Apple MacBook M5 Stays Stable
  • State of Decay 3 Playtests Confirmed With Mutated Zombies and Co-op
  • Starfield Launches on PS5 With Two Modes and Full DualSense Support
  • ASUS Accused of Failing to Fix Laptop After 10 RMAs, User Denied 11th Request
  • New Rowhammer Attacks Turn NVIDIA GPUs Into a System-Level Security Risk

Quick Links

  • About OnMSFT.com
  • Contact OnMSFT
  • Join Our Team
  • Privacy Policy
© 2010–2026 OnMSFT.com LLC. All rights reserved.
About OnMSFT.comContact OnMSFTPrivacy Policy